Plaspro GMBH v. Gens et al
Plaintiff: Plaspro GMBH
Defendant: Timothy Gens and Chemacoustic Technologies, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2009cv04302
Filed: September 16, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
County: Outside US
Presiding Judge: Richard Seeborg
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 129 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT by Judge Paul S. Grewal denying 123 Motion to Reopen Case; denying 123 Motion to enforce settlement agreement (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2013)
April 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 115 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF PLASPRO GMBH'S DEADLINE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT re 114 Stipulation filed by Plaspro GMBH. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on April 4, 2011. (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2011)
March 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 113 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS; ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE by Judge Paul S. Grewal granting in part and denying in part 90 Motion to Dismiss; denying 92 Motion to Strike (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2011)
January 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 105 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF PLASPRO'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS, INCLUDING ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS by Judge Paul S. Grewal denying 85 Motion for Sanctions (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2011)
November 18, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 84 ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on November 18, 2010. (pvtlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2010)
October 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO TRANSFER FOR CONVENIENCE PURSUANT TO 28 USC SECTION 1404(a) by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull denying 62 Motion to Change Venue (pvtlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2010)
July 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER RE: 10 DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 07/28/2010. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2010)
April 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER RE: 10 MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/12/2010. (rslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2010)
February 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER RE: 10 DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 02/26/2010. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2010).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Plaspro GMBH v. Gens et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Plaspro GMBH
Represented By: David S. Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Timothy Gens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chemacoustic Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Babach Lau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?