Lahore et al v. SCME Mortgage Banlers,Inc. et al
| Marco Lahore and Miriam Maldonaldo |
| SCME Mortgage Banlers,Inc., Aurora Loan Services, Inc., Cal-Western Reconveyance Corp., UVC Financial and Laura SantaMaria |
| 5:2009cv04776 |
| October 7, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| James Ware |
| Richard Seeborg |
| Defendant |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge James Ware on February 25, 2010. (jwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2010)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: RULE 11 SANCTIONS. On or before 2/11/2010 , Plaintiffs' counsel shall file a response to the Order to Show Cause. In his response, counsel shall set forth the legal basis for his Motion to Consolidate or a good fai th extension of the law. Failure to comply with any part of this Order will be deemed sufficient grounds for sanctions. Signed by Judge James Ware on February 8, 2010. (jwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2010) Modified text on 2/9/2010 (ecg, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER RE: 7 AUTHORIZING SERVICE BY DELIVERY TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/23/09. (rslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2009)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER setting consent/declination deadline. (rslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2009)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
