Powell v. Residential Mortgage Capital et al
| Timothy Powell |
| Residential Mortgage Capital, National Home Equity, General Motors Acceptance Corporation, Noel McCord and First Net Mortgage |
| 5:2009cv04928 |
| October 16, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Cruz |
| Jeremy Fogel |
| Patricia V. Trumbull |
| None |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1640 Truth in Lending |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 58 Motion to Dismiss. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2010)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY re 57 . Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 7/19/10. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2010)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER BY JUDGE JEREMY FOGEL GRANTING DEFENDANTS' 41 42 21 MOTIONS TO DISMISS. (jflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2010)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER APPROVING 13 STIPULATION TO TAKE PLAINTIFF TIMOTHY POWELL'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND OSC RE: PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION OFF CALENDAR AND TO POSTPONE TRUSTEE'S SALE. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 10/26/2009. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2009)
|
|
Filing
11
NOTICE BY JUDGE JEREMY FOGEL OF 2 APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND REQUEST FOR RESPONSE FROM DEFENDANT GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION.(jflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2009)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
