Padayachi v. IndyMac Bank et al
| Yasish Mogan Padayachi |
| IndyMac Bank, One West Bank and Quality Loan Service Corp. |
| 5:2009cv05545 |
| November 23, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Alameda |
| Patricia V. Trumbull |
| Patricia V. Trumbull |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Property |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER GRANTING 37 DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 10/28/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2010)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER BY JUDGE JEREMY FOGEL GRANTING 34 PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME. Signed by Judge JEREMY FOGEL on 8/26/2010. (jflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2010)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER BY JUDGE JEREMY FOGEL GRANTING 24 DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. (jflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2010)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER GRANTING 5 , 15 DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 4/7/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2010)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER Extending Schedule for Motion to Dismiss; and Extending Deadline for Parties to File Either a "Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge," or a "Declination to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge and Request for Reassignment." Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on 1/20/10. (pvtlc1) (Filed on 1/20/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
