Carreon v. Alza Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Sergio L Carreon
Defendant: Alza Corporation and Sandoz, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2009cv05623
Filed: November 30, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Howard R. Lloyd
Presiding Judge: Richard Seeborg
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 72 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/18/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2011)
January 12, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER APPROVING COMPROMISE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/12/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2011)
December 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE ON PETITION TO COMPROMISE re 60 . Motion Hearing set for 1/13/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/29/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/30/2010)
November 24, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 56 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO RESCHEDULE DISMISSAL DEADLINE AND HEARING TO SHOW CASUE. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 1/27/2011 01:30 PM. Deadline to file the stipulated dismissal no later than 1/20/11. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/24/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/24/2010)
October 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 51 STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/12/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2010)
September 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 12/9/2010 01:30 PM. Show Cause Response due by 12/2/2010. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/27/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2010)
July 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 37 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 35 TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR MEDIATION. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/8/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2010)
February 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER RE: 6 DENYING MOTION TO REMAND. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 02/09/2010. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2010).
December 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER RE: FILING DEADLINE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/14/2009. (rslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2009)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carreon v. Alza Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sergio L Carreon
Represented By: Helen E Zukin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alza Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sandoz, Inc.
Represented By: Michael Carl Zellers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?