Wasney v. Schwartz
| David A. Wasney, Sr. |
| Donald Charles Schwartz |
| Marilyn Morgan and USBC Manager-San Jose |
| John Richardson |
| 5:2009cv05831 |
| December 11, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Jeremy Fogel |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER AFFIRMING DECISION OF BANKRUPTCY COURT. The clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/20/2012. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/20/2012)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE. As the Bankruptcy Court has now transmitted the record on appeal, the parties shall commencing briefing pursuant to Bankruptcy Local Rule 8010-1. Accordingly, the appellant shall file and serve an opening brief no later than 5/7/2012. The appellee shall file and serve a responding brief no later than 21 days after service of the appellants brief. Appellant may file and serve a reply brief no later than 14 days after service of the appellees brief. All briefs must comply with Federal Rule of Bankruptcy 8010. This matter will be deemed submitted upon completion of the briefing unless otherwise ordered by the court. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 4/16/2012. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2012)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Having reviewed Plaintiffs filing, it now appears that the record will be prepared and transmitted to this court for resolution of this action. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 4/3/2012. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2012)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Wasney shall file a brief declaration in response to this Order to Show Cause detailing the efforts made to secure the record and providing any other pertinent information on or before 3/30/2012. If Wasney does not file a respon se as directed, the Court will dismiss the action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). No hearing will be held on the order to show cause unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/15/2012. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2012)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER GRANTING 30 Notice of Withdrawal of 19 Ex Parte Application to Stay Action Pending Appeal filed by Donald Charles Schwartz. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/28/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2012)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER RE: DEFENDANT'S PENDING ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS. As this action is already scheduled for hearing on September 9, 2011, for Plaintiffs Motion to Remand, the court will address Defendants pending administrative requests (Docket Item Nos. 15, 16, 19) in the ensuring order on that motion. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/31/2011. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2011)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER REOPENING CASE. Signed by Judge Koh on 12/15/2010. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2010)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk shall close the file and terminate any pending motions. Signed by Judge Koh on 9/16/2010. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2010)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 9/16/2010 01:30 PM. Show Cause Response due by 9/9/2010. Signed by Judge Koh on 8/13/2010. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
