Vasudevan Software, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corporation et al
| Vasudevan Software, Inc. |
| International Business Machines Corporation and Oracle Corporation |
| Oracle Corporation |
| Vasudevan Software, Inc. |
| 5:2009cv05897 |
| December 21, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| Richard Seeborg |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
276
STIPULATION AND ORDER AND JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/19/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2011)
|
|
Filing
274
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/11/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2011)
|
|
Filing
272
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 271 MOTION TO STAY ALL PENDING DEADLINES REGARDING PLAINTIFF VSI AND DEFENDANT ORACLE. Stipulation filed by Oracle Corporation Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/29/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2011)
|
|
Filing
270
ORDER JOINT STIPULATED MOTION TO STAY ALL PENDING DEADLINES REGARDING PLAINTIFF VSI AND DEFENDANT IBM. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/27/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2011)
|
|
Filing
260
ORDER JOINT STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION AND FOR MOTIONS TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO SAME. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/13/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2011)
|
|
Filing
232
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 231 PLAINTIFF'S PROPOSED AMENDED INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS AND DEFENDANTS' PROPOSED AMENDED INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/10/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2011)
|
|
Filing
199
ORDER GRANTING 193 Plaintiff's Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. Plaintiff shall file the documents under seal in accordance with the procedures set forth in Civil Local Rule 79-5 and General Order 62. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 3/7/2011. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2011)
|
|
Filing
198
ORDER (1) GRANTING 181 VSi's Motion for Leave to Amend Its Infringement Contentions, (2) DENYING 182 IBM's Motion to Compel Pre-Filing Investigation Discovery, and (3) GRANTING 183 IBM's Motion to Compel VSi to Respond to Its Interrogatory No. 15. See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 2/18/2011. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2011)
|
|
Filing
194
ORDER RE: 154 CLAIM CONSTRUCTION. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/20/11.(rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2011)
|
|
Filing
160
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 152 Motion for Protective Order. See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 09/14/2010. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2010)
|
|
Filing
151
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING SOURCE CODE OF IBM CORPORATION AS AMENDED BY THE COURT AND ORDER re 145 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 07/20/2010. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2010)
|
|
Filing
117
ORDER RE: 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 GRANTING MOTIONS TO WITHDRAW. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 02/11/2010. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2010).
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER RE: 62 GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY ANDREW G. HEINZ PRO HAC VICE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 01/14/2010. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 01/19/2010).
|
|
Filing
49
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The Court has carefully reviewed the facts and applicable law regarding Defendants motion to transfer. The Court finds, based on the consideration of both private and public interest factors in this case, that the Northern District of California is a more convenient forum than this District. The Court therefore GRANTS Defendants motion to transfer to the Northern District of California. Signed by Judge Donald E. Walter on 11/10/09. (ehs, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
