Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Monterey Gourmet Foods, Inc.
| Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
| Monterey Gourmet Foods, Inc. |
| 5:2010cv00152 |
| January 12, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| James Ware |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
ORDER re 64 Stipulation of Dismissal. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 2/14/2014. (lhklc5S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2014)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER re 60 DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO JOINT STIPULATION. Signed by Judge Koh on 5/24/2011. The Clerk shall close the file. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2011)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER re 57 Proposed Consent Decree. Signed by Judge Koh on 5/18/2011.(lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2011)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER re 52 Continuing Case Management Conference based on Parties' Notice of Settlement. Case Management Conference now set for 4/13/2011 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Koh on 3/21/2011. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2011)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER re 39 Parties' Request for Clarification of Discovery Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 2/8/2011. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2011)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER re 46 Granting Joint Stipulation to Extend Mediation Deadline to March 16, 2011. Signed by Judge Koh on 1/20/2011. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2011)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd re 30 plaintiffs/intervenors' Motion for Protective Order. 10/12/2010 motion hearing is vacated. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2010)
|
|
Filing
24
REVISED 23 ORDER GRANTING 8 Motion to Intervene. On or before 6/7/2010,Intervenor Plaintiffs shall filed their Complaint in Intervention. Joint Case Management Statement due by 6/18/2010. Case Management Conference set for 6/28/2010 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge James Ware on 5/27/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2010)
|
|
Filing
13
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 11 to continue case management conference. Initial case management conference continued to 6/8/2010, 1:30 PM. Plaintiff's consent or declination due by 4/6/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 3/30/2010. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Monterey Gourmet Foods, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission | |
| Represented By: | William Robert Tamayo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Monterey Gourmet Foods, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
