Buccellato v. AT&T Inc.,
| Matthew Buccellato |
| AT&T Inc., |
| 5:2010cv00463 |
| February 2, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Patricia V. Trumbull |
| James Ware |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh Granting 78 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2011)
|
|
Filing
76
Order Granting 70 Motion for Final Approval of Settlement and Dismissing Case with Prejudice. The Clerk shall close the file. Signed by Judge Koh on 6/30/2011. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2011)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER Approving 59 Joint Stipulation. Signed by Judge Koh on 3/28/2011. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2011)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER re 56 Approving Joint Stipulation to Amend Class Settlement Agreement and Exhibits. Signed by Judge Koh on 3/11/2011. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2011) Modified on 3/11/2011 (lhklc3, COURT STAFF). Modified on 3/11/2011 (lhklc3, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER Granting 50 Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Settlement. Signed by Judge Koh on 2/17/2011. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2011)
|
|
Filing
49
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 48 . Parties shall file Motion for Preliminary Approval of Settlement by 1/13/2011. Motion Hearing set for 2/17/2011 at 1:30PM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Lucy H. Koh. Signed by Judge Koh on 1/10/2011. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2011)
|
|
Filing
44
STIPULATION and ORDER re 42 Granting Plaintiff's Unopposed Request for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint. Plaintiff shall file Second Amended Complaint as a separate docket entry by December 16, 2010. Signed by Judge Koh on 12/13/2010. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2010)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Private ADR re 33 Stipulation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 6/10/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2010)
|
|
Filing
7
STIPULATION AND ORDER AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT to File First Amended Compaint re 6 Stipulation. Amended Complaint due by 4/2/2010. The Amended Complaint shall be filed as a separate docket entry. Signed by Judge James Ware on 3/26/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2010)
|
|
Filing
5
STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Time to Respond to Complaint re 4 Stipulation. Deadline to respond by 3/23/2010. Signed by Judge James Ware on 2/19/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Buccellato v. AT&T Inc., | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Matthew Buccellato | |
| Represented By: | Jaron Razilee Shipp |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: AT&T Inc., | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
