Johnson v. Fritz et al
| Anthony Wayne Johnson |
| R.W. Fritz, A. Hedgpeth and M. Cate |
| 5:2010cv01673 |
| April 19, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Monterey |
| James Ware |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS; REVOKING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS; ADDRESSING PENDING MOTIONS. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/12/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2011)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER by Judge James Ware Denying 12 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2011)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL AND OF SERVICE; DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION OR NOTICE REGARDING SUCH MOTION; INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK. The clerk of the Court shall issue summons and the United States Marshal shall serve, without prepaymen t of fees, a copy of the complaint, all attachments thereto, and a copy of this order upon defendants R. W. Fritz and Anthony Hedgpeth at Salinas Valley State Prison, (P.O. Box 1020, Soledad, CA 93960-1020). The claims against defendant Matthew Cate are DISMISSED. The Clerk shall terminate this defendant from this action. M. Cate terminated. Signed by Judge James Ware on 2/15/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
