Hewlett-Packard Company et al v. Microjet Technology Co, Ltd et al
Hewlett-Packard Company and Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. |
Microjet Technology Co, Ltd, Asia Pacific Microsystems, Inc, Guangzhou, Mextec Group Inc., Sinotime Technologies Inc, PTC Holdings Limited, MIPO Science and Technology Limited and MIPO Technology Limited |
5:2010cv02175 |
May 20, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Santa Clara |
Howard R. Lloyd |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 58 ORDER CONTINUING STAY. Signed by Judge James Ware on 1/24/12. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2012) |
Filing 55 ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case Management Statement due by 1/20/2012. Case Management Conference set for 1/30/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge James Ware on 12/20/11. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2011) |
Filing 53 ORDER REQUIRING JOINT STATUS STATEMENT Status Report due by 10/11/2011. Signed by Judge James Ware on 9/29/11. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2011) |
Filing 48 ORDER APPROVING 46 JOINT STIPULATION FOR STAY PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1659 AND CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 7-1(b), 7-2, AND 16-2(d). Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 8/9/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2010) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.