Kowalsky v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Chaim Kowalsky |
Hewlett-Packard Company |
5:2010cv02176 |
May 20, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Patricia V. Trumbull |
Contract Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 112 Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 111 Stipulation.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2012) |
Filing 99 ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh denying without prejudice 71 Motion to Certify Class; ORDER re related administrative motions 75 , 83 , 91 , 94 , 95 . (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2012) |
Filing 79 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER re 60 MODIFIED BY THE COURT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 1/18/2012. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2012) |
Filing 62 ORDER Extending Date for Mediation. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 9/30/2011. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2011) |
Filing 51 ORDER SETTING CASE SCHEDULE re 50 . Case Management Statement due by 8/4/2011. Case Management Conference set for 8/11/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose. Motion Hearing set for 8/11/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Lucy H. Koh. Signed by Judge Koh on 5/6/2011. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2011) |
Filing 48 ORDER by Judge Koh granting 44 Motion for Reconsideration. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2011) |
Filing 43 ORDER GRANTING 38 MOTION for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration. Case Management Conference set for 4/14/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose. Motion Hearing set for 4/14/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Lucy H. Koh. Signed by Judge Koh on 2/22/2011. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2011) |
Filing 42 STIPULATION AND ORDER Setting Time for Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company to Answer Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Koh on 2/10/2011. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2011) |
Filing 37 ORDER SETTING TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND ANSWER pursuant to 36 parties' stipulation. Signed by Judge Koh on 12/29/2010. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2010) |
Filing 35 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 23 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Koh on 12/13/2010. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2010) |
Filing 18 ORDER SETTING TIME FOR FILING BRIEFS (approving 17 ). Case Management Conference and Motion Hearing set for 11/12/2010 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 7/16/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2010) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Kowalsky v. Hewlett-Packard Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Chaim Kowalsky | |
Represented By: | Jordan L. Lurie |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Hewlett-Packard Company | |
Represented By: | Blaine H. Evanson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.