Chandler v. Cate et al
| Janine Simone Chandler |
| Matthew Cate and Velda Dobson-Davis |
| 5:2010cv02452 |
| June 3, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Madera |
| Lucy H. Koh |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh denying 37 Motion to Appoint Counsel.(lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2013)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh denying 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; denying 28 Motion for Hearing; denying 29 Motion for Hearing; denying 30 Motion to Appoint Counsel (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2012)
|
|
Filing
24
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 21 Motion for Leave to File Brief in Excess of 25 Pages. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2011)
|
|
Filing
18
Order Denying 17 Third Motion for Extension of Time to file Answer. Signed by Judge Koh on 8/30/2011. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2011)
|
|
Filing
16
Order Granting 15 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Signed by Judge Koh on 6/30/2011. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2011)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER Granting 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. Signed by Judge Koh on 5/5/2011. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2011)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER re 9 Denying Motion to Dismiss. Respondents shall answer the petition as specified in the Order. Signed by Judge Koh on 3/14/2011. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
