Cahill et al v. Onewest Bank et al
| Kenneth A Cahill, Jessica Ball, Oredus Brown, Arlene & Danny Comiso, Manuel & Fatima Demello, Angelito P Perea, Jesse Sanchez, Connie & John Tripp, Robin Weatherwax, Harvey Young and Chris & Jill Dana |
| Onewest Bank and Michael Perry |
| 5:2010cv02781 |
| June 24, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Alameda |
| Patricia V. Trumbull |
| Truth in Lending |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER GRANTING AS UNOPPOSED DEFENDANT ONEWEST BANK FSB'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull granting 21 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 23 Motion to Appear by Telephone; finding as moot 25 Motion to Appear by Telephone; finding as moot 12 Motion to Dismiss (pvtlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2010)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on October 28, 2010. (pvtlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2010)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR PARTIES TO FILE EITHER A "CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE," OR ELSE A "DECLINATION TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT." Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on July 20, 2010. (pvtlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
