Kahn v. Ordonez et al
| Alan R. Kahn |
| Kathy Ordonez, Richard H. Ayers, Jean-Luc Belingard, William G. Green, Peter Barton Hutt, Gail K. Naughton, Wayne I. Roe, Bennett M. Shapiro and Celera Corporation |
| 5:2010cv02935 |
| July 2, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| James Ware |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
Order Granting 78 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Attorney Jordan Eth and Judson Earle Lobdell terminated. Signed by Hon. Edward J. Davila on 3/13/2013. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2013)
|
|
Filing
76
STIPULATION AND ORDER Vacating 12/2/2011 Case Management Conference re 75 Stipulation. The case management conference currently scheduled for December 2, 2011, shall be rescheduled to a date and time that is convenient to the Court after the Court has ruled on defendants' pending motion to dismiss the Securities Action; and the parties shall file a Joint Case Management Conference Statement ten days prior to the conference. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/23/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2011)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER Denying 58 , 64 Motion for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration; Denying 68 Motion for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Record. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/25/2011 (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2011) Modified text on 5/25/2011 (ecg, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
70
STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Defendants' Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' Amended Consolidated Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/10/2011. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2011).
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 39 Motion for Leave to File; Denying 42 Motion to Stay; Denying 43 Motion to Expedite (jwlc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2011).(Correction of Incomplete Filing re 55 )(ecg, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
53
STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING HEARING DATE FOR PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO AMEND re 52 Stipulation. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 39 MOTION for Leave to File: Motion Hearing set for 4/18/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. James Ware. Signed by Judge James Ware on 4/12/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2011)
|
|
Filing
46
STIPULATION AND ORDER AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT Setting Expedited Briefing Schedule and Terminated Pending Motions. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 42 MOTION to Stay Temporary Stay in Favor of Parallel Delaware State Court Proceeding; Memorandum of Po ints and Authorities in Support Thereof, 43 MOTION to Expedite Discovery.Oppositions due by 3/30/2011. Motion Hearing set for 4/18/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. James Ware. *** 4/11/2011 Hearing/Deadlines; Motions terminated: 31 MOTION to Dismiss, 30 MOTION to Dismiss. Signed by Judge James Ware on 3/29/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2011)
|
|
Filing
29
STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Request to Continue Defendants' Deadline to File Their Motion to Dismiss From Monday, January 17, 2011, to Tuesday, January 18, 2011 re 28 Stipulation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 1/14/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2011)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER DENYING 26 Stipulation. Accordingly, the Court DENIES the Stipulation and Proposed Order for New Briefing Schedule and Continuing Case Management Conference. However, since Defendants relied on the Stipulation and did not file a responsive pl eading by the scheduled deadline, the Court readjusts the schedule as follows: Defendants shall file their anticipated Motion to Dismiss on or before 1/17/2011. Plaintiffs shall file their Opposition on or before 3/4/2011. Defendants shall file their Reply on or before 3/21/2011. Motion Hearing set for 4/11/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. The Court VACATES the 3/28/2011 Case Management Conference as premature and will set a new Conference date in its Order addressing the anticipated Motion, if necessary. None of these dates may be modified without the Court's approval. Signed by Judge James Ware on 12/15/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2010)
|
|
Filing
25
STIPULATION AND ORDER AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Joint Case Management Statement due by 3/18/2011. Case Management Conference set for 3/28/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge James Ware on 11/10/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2010)
|
|
Filing
13
STIPULATION AND ORDER AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT Consolidating Actions and Related Matters re (6 Stipulation in 5:10-cv-02935-JW). The following actions are hereby related and consolidated for all purposes, including pre-trial proceedings and trial: K ahn v. Ordonez, et al. No. C 10-02935 and Greenberg v. Ordonez, et al. No. C 10-03029. Every pleading filed in the consolidated action, or in any separate action included herein, shall bear the following caption: No. C 10-02935 JW, "In re Celera Corp. Derviative Ligiation" The files of the consolidated action shall be maintained in one file under Master File No. C 10-02935 JW. The Clerk shall close C 10-03029. Consolidated Complaint due by 10/15/2010. Joint Case Management Statement due by 11/5/2010. Case Management Conference set for 11/15/2010 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Please see Order for further specifics. Signed by Judge James Ware on 9/23/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
