Lim v. Seaside Financial Corporation et al
| Pepito C Lim |
| First Federal Bank of California, Seaside Financial Corporation and TD Service Company |
| 5:2010cv03596 |
| August 16, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION. Accordingly, the Court hereby orders Plaintiff to show cause on 2/28/2011 at 9:00 AM if any, by actual appearance in Court, and by certification filed with the Court on or before 2/18/2011, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The certificate shall set forth in factual summary the reason no Amended Complaint has been filed and what steps Plaintiff is taking to prosecute the action. If Plaintiff fails to file t he certification, the 2/28/2011 hearing will be vacated automatically and the case will be dismissed. Failure to comply with any part of this Order will be deemed sufficient grounds to dismiss the action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Signed by Judge James Ware on 1/20/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2011)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER That Case Be Reassigned to a District Court Judge; REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 7 defendants' motion to dismiss. Objections to R&R due by 11/22/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 11/3/2010. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2010)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER Setting Deadline for Consent or Declination to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff's consent or declination due by 9/30/2010. Hearing re 7 defendants' motion to dismiss continued to 11/2/2010, 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 9/14/2010. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
