Sabouri-Cichani v. Samuels Jewelers, Inc.
| Jila Sabouri-Cichani |
| Samuels Jewelers, Inc. |
| 5:2010cv04041 |
| September 9, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Jeremy Fogel |
| Patricia V. Trumbull |
| Other Labor Litigation |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER granting 35 Motion for Summary Judgment by Judge Edward J. Davila. (ejdlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2012)
|
|
Filing
44
PRETRIAL ORDER - JURY TRIAL. Based on the parties' Joint Preliminary Pretrial Conference Statement, the court has determined an appearance is unnecessary at this time. Accordingly, the 5/25/2012 Preliminary Pretrial Conference is VACATED and the parties are ordered to comply with the following schedule: Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement, Motions in Limine and Exchange of Exhibits due by 10/26/2012. Voir Dire Questions, Proposed Jury Instructions,and Proposed Jury Verdict Forms due b y 10/30/2012. Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/9/2012 11:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose. Jury Selection set for 11/26/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Edward J. Davila. Jury Trial set for 11/27/2012, 11/2 8/2012, 11/29/2012, 12/3/2012, 12/4/2012. Jury Deliberations set for 12/5/2012, 12/6/2012, 12/7/2012 before Hon. Edward J. Davila. Please see Order for further specifics. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/22/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2012)
|
|
Filing
32
AMENDED ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING UPDATED CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on December 7, 2011. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2011)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING UPDATED CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on December 6, 2011. (ejdlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2011)
|
|
Filing
20
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER re 19 Stipulation filed by Samuels Jewelers, Inc. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on January 24, 2011. (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2011)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER RE PARTIES' PROPOSED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER re 17 Stipulation filed by Samuels Jewelers, Inc. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on January 19, 2011. (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2011)
|
|
Filing
14
STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS re 11 , Case referred to mediation. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 1/3/11. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sabouri-Cichani v. Samuels Jewelers, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jila Sabouri-Cichani | |
| Represented By: | Brian Stuart Kreger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Samuels Jewelers, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Lauren Sunley Kim |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
