Tavant Technologies, Inc. v. Narayana et al
| Tavant Technologies, Inc. |
| Ravishankar Bettadapura Narayana, Satish Kumar Kommuri, Ramkumar Yadav Krishnan and Dhamodharan Pathervellai |
| 5:2010cv04301 |
| September 23, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Patricia V. Trumbull |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 40 DEFENDANTS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR INTERIM STAY; AND CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference set for 12/17/2010 is CONTINUED to 2/4/2011 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 12/9/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2010)
|
|
Filing
21
STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS re 20 Stipulation and Proposed Order selecting Mediation filed by Tavant Technologies, Inc. Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on November 10, 2010. (pvtlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2010)
|
|
Filing
10
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO SET DEADLINES FOR PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE THERETO re 9 Stipulation, filed by Tavant Technologies, Inc. Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on October 26, 2010. (pvtlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
