UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Wilson et al
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| Thomas Wilson, Margo Alexander and State of California Franchise Tax Board |
| 5:2010cv04656 |
| October 15, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7401 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER APPROVING 41 STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/16/2011. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2011)
|
|
Filing
34
MODIFIED SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/10/2011. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2011)
|
|
Filing
31
SCHEDULING ORDER. Based on their joint submission, it appears that a schedule for the case can be set without the necessity of an appearance at this time. Accordingly, the Case Management Conference is VACATED and the parties are ordered to comply wi th the following schedule: Deadline for parties to contact Court's ADR Program on 5/23/2011. Close of All Discovery due by 8/1/2011. Last Date for Hearing Dispositive Motions by 10/3/2011. Preliminary Pretrial Conference Statement due by 6/17/2 011. Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 6/27/2011 11:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. James Ware. None of the dates set in this Order may be changed without an order of the Court made after a motion is filed pursuant to the Civil Local Rules of Court. Signed by Judge James Ware on 3/9/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2011)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER FINDING AS MOOT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE FEBRUARY 14 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 28 Stipulation. The parties' Stipulation to continue the Case Management Conference from February 14, 2011 to March 14, 2011 is found as MOOT. The Court previously issued it's Order continuing the February 14 Case Management Conference to March 14, 2011 at 10:00 AM. Please see Docket Item No. 25 . Signed by Judge James Ware on 2/11/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2011)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Joint Case Management Statement due by 3/4/2011. Case Management Conference set for 3/14/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge James Ware on 2/9/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2011)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Upon review, the Court finds good cause to CONTINUE the 1/24/2011 Conference to allow Defendants to participate in the Joint Case Management Statement. Joint Case Management Statement due by 2/4/2011. Case Management Conference set for 2/14/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge James Ware on 1/20/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2011)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. In light of the fact that Defendants have not yet been served, the Court finds that a Case Management Conference is premature at this time. Accordingly, the Court CONTINUES the December 20 Conference to Ja nuary 24, 2011 at 10 a.m. On or before January 14, 2011, the parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement. The Statement shall include, inter alia, a good faith proposed schedule on how this case should proceed. Plaintiff shall serve this Order on Defendants along with the Summons and Complaint. Signed by Judge James Ware on 12/15/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
