San Francisco Technology Inc. v. Reckitt Benckiser Inc.
| San Francisco Technology Inc. |
| Reckitt Benckiser Inc. |
| 5:2010cv04989 |
| March 5, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Jeremy Fogel |
| Paul Singh Grewal |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1355 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTION HEARING TO ALLOW TIME FOR SETTLEMENT re 49 . Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 7/7/11. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2011)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME (granting in part 33 ). Defendant's Motion to Stay Discovery set for 7/22/2011 is RESET for 7/8/2011 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Jeremy Fogel. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 6/22/2011. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2011)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER GRANTING 7 MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on March 17, 2011. (jflc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2011)
|
|
Filing
18
SITPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR THE UNITED STATES TO INTERVENE (approving 17 ). Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 2/4/2011. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2011)
|
|
Filing
2
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER to Sever Defendant Reckitt Benckiser, Inc.. Signed by Judge Fogel on 10/27/10. (srm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
