Gates v. Atascadero State Hospital

Gates v. Atascadero State Hospital

Plaintiff:	David Marshall Gates
Defendant:	Atascadero State Hospital
Case Number:	5:2010cv05387
Filed:	November 29, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office:	San Jose Office
County:	Alameda
Presiding Judge:	James Ware
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Prison Condition
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 17, 2011	Filing 8 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. More than sixty days have passed since the mail addressed to Plaintiff was returned as undeliverable. The Court has not received a notice from Plaintiff of a new address. Accordingly, the instant civil rights action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 3-11 of the Northern District Local Rules. The Clerk shall terminate any pending motions. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/11/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2011)
February 11, 2011	Filing 5 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Plaintiff is directed to file a legible amended complaint, either typewritten or handwritten in a manner in which it can clearly be read, within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. Failure to file an a mended complaint in the time provided will result in the dismissal of the case without prejudice without further notice to plaintiff. The clerk shall enclose two copies of the court's form complaint with a copy of this order to plaintiff. Signed by Judge James Ware on 2/11/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Form Habeas Complaint)(ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2011)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 17, 2011

Filing 8 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. More than sixty days have passed since the mail addressed to Plaintiff was returned as undeliverable. The Court has not received a notice from Plaintiff of a new address. Accordingly, the instant civil rights action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 3-11 of the Northern District Local Rules. The Clerk shall terminate any pending motions. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/11/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2011)

February 11, 2011

Filing 5 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Plaintiff is directed to file a legible amended complaint, either typewritten or handwritten in a manner in which it can clearly be read, within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. Failure to file an a mended complaint in the time provided will result in the dismissal of the case without prejudice without further notice to plaintiff. The clerk shall enclose two copies of the court's form complaint with a copy of this order to plaintiff. Signed by Judge James Ware on 2/11/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Form Habeas Complaint)(ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2011)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gates v. Atascadero State Hospital
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Marshall Gates
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Atascadero State Hospital
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?