G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Ho et al
Plaintiff: G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant: Kim Hung Ho and Jadelor Corporation
Case Number: 5:2010cv05716
Filed: December 15, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Howard R. Lloyd
Nature of Suit: Cable/Satellite TV
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Having reviewed counsels' response, the court finds that sanctions should not be imposed under these circumstances. Accordingly, the Order to Show Cause issued July 1, 2014, is DISCHARGED and the hearin g scheduled for July 25, 2014, is VACATED. However, the court will maintain its previous order concerning writs of execution: the clerk shall not issue any writs of execution in this action without a court order allowing for them to issue. Requests for a writ of execution shall be made to the court by administrative motion pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-11. ***7/18/2014 Deadlines terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/18/2014. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2014)
July 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER STRIKING ABSTRACT OF JUDGMENT; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SANCTIONS. Attorney Alan L. Rosen, the Law Offices of Rosen & Loeb, Attorney Thomas P. Riley, and the Law Offices of Thomas P. Riley, P.C. are ordered to appear on 7/25/2014 at 10:00 a.m . to show cause why the court should not impose any and all appropriate sanctions, including monetary sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(c), on them or any one of them. These individuals or entities may file a response to this order demonstrating good cause why sanctions should not be imposed on or before 7/15/2014. The Abstract of Judgment submitted on 6/30/2014 24 is STRICKEN. The clerk shall not issue any writs of execution in this action without a court order allowing for them to issue. Requests for a writ of execution shall be made to the court by administrative motion pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-11. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/1/2014. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2014)
December 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 19 Order by Hon. Edward J. Davila granting 15 Motion for Default Judgment.(ejdlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2011)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Ho et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Represented By: Thomas Peter Riley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kim Hung Ho
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jadelor Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?