Pragmatus AV, LLC v. Facebook, Inc. et al

Plaintiff: Pragmatus AV, LLC
Defendant: Facebook, Inc., YouTube, LLC, Linkedin Corporation and Photobucket.com, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2011cv00494
Filed: February 3, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Edward J. Davila
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 5, 2011 Filing 150 Order by Hon. Edward J. Davila granting 125 Motion to Stay. (ejdlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2011)
August 12, 2011 Filing 137 STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Stipulation Extending Briefing Schedule for Defendants' Motion to Stay Case Pending Order in Inter Partes Reexamination of Patents-in-Suit re 136 Stipulation. Opposition due Responses due by 8/25/2011. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/12/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2011)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pragmatus AV, LLC v. Facebook, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pragmatus AV, LLC
Represented By: Mark Wayne Wasserman
Represented By: Matthew Robertson Sheldon
Represented By: David Thomas Pollock
Represented By: Brent Ryan Gary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Facebook, Inc.
Represented By: Scott Allen Cole
Represented By: Matthew P Gubiotti
Represented By: Heidi Lyn Keefe
Represented By: Michael Graham Rhodes
Represented By: Mark R. Weinstein
Represented By: Justin Patrick Daniel Wilcox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: YouTube, LLC
Represented By: Veronica S. Ascarrunz
Represented By: Veronica Susana Ascarrunz
Represented By: Robin Lynn Brewer
Represented By: Stefani Elise Shanberg
Represented By: Larry L. Shatzer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Linkedin Corporation
Represented By: Daralyn J. Durie
Represented By: Joseph Charles Gratz
Represented By: Clement S. Roberts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Photobucket.com, Inc.
Represented By: Dan D. Davison
Represented By: David Marion Foster
Represented By: Aaron Damion Gopen
Represented By: George Washington Jordan, III
Represented By: John Anthony O'Malley
Represented By: Miriam Latorre Quinn
Represented By: Kimberly Sullivan Walker
Represented By: Richard Stephen Zembek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?