Orange County Electrical Industry Health & Welfare Trust Fund -v- Action Electric Corporation
Orange County Electrical Industry Health and Welfare Trust Fund and David Chappell |
Action Electric Corportion |
5:2011cv00575 |
February 8, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Alameda |
Edward J. Davila |
Howard R. Lloyd |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
29 U.S.C. ยง 185 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Dismissal Without Prejudice re 20 Stipulation filed by Action Electric Corporation. The Clerk shall close this file. ***All Deadlines terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/19/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2011) |
Filing 16 STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 15 Stipulation filed by Action Electric Corporation. Case Management Statement due by 9/2/2011. Case Management Conference set for 9/9/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/5/2011. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2011) |
Filing 13 ORDER Continuing Case Management Conference re 12 . Case Management Statement due by 6/22/2011. Case Management Conference set for 6/29/2011 02:00 PM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Koh on 4/22/2011. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2011) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.