Chacon v. City of San Jose et al
| Luis Chacon |
| City of San Jose, San Jose Police Department, Barthelemy and Gromdahl |
| 5:2011cv00908 |
| February 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 32 DISMISSING CASE. Case dismissed with prejudice. Each side to bear their own fees and costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 7/17/2012. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2012)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re Settlement. All pending motions and previously scheduled deadlines and appearances are vacated. Stipulated dismissal due by 7/16/2012. If dismissal not filed by that date, then Show Cause Response due by 7/24/2012 and Show Cause Hearing set for 7/31/2012 10:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 5/16/2012. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2012)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER denying 17 parties' request to extend time for discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 1/5/2012. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2012)
|
|
Filing
7
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 6 REFERRING CASE to Early Neutral Evaluation. Deadline for ADR session: 90 days from the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 5/11/2011. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
