Tetsuya v. You Tube, LLC
| Joe Nomura Tetsuya |
| You Tube, LLC |
| 5:2011cv01208 |
| March 11, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| San Francisco |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
142
ORDER by Judge Lloyd denying 125 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution; granting 134 Motion for Summary Judgment (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2013)
|
|
Filing
133
ORDER by Judge Lloyd granting in part and denying in part 121 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying 124 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2013)
|
|
Filing
119
Order by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd granting 114 Motion for Extension of Time to Submit Expert Reports and Complete Expert Discovery(rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2013)
|
|
Filing
111
Order by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd granting 110 Motion for Permission for Electronic Case Filing (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2013)
|
|
Filing
109
Certificate/Proof of Service of 108 (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2013)
|
|
Filing
107
Order by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd granting 101 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Daniel Stephen Mount and Kevin Martin Pasquinelli terminated (rmwlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2013)
|
|
Filing
105
Order by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd granting 102 Motion to Expedite (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2013)
|
|
Filing
95
Order by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd granting 94 Motion to Appear by Telephone (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2013)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER construing claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,254,622 (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2013)
|
|
Filing
88
Order by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd granting 87 Motion to allow equipment into the courtroom (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2012)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER denying 80 Motion to Strike (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2012)
|
|
Filing
78
Order by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd granting 77 Stipulation.(rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2012)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER re Joint Stipulation re Scheduling. Parties to file Joint Case Management Statement by 4/17/2012. Case management conference set for 4/24/2012, 1:30 PM, Courtroom 2, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 3/19/2012. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tetsuya v. You Tube, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joe Nomura Tetsuya | |
| Represented By: | Kevin Martin Pasquinelli |
| Represented By: | Daniel Stephen Mount |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: You Tube, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Victor Yee Kay Hsue |
| Represented By: | Bryan J. Sinclair |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
