Noh et al v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc et al
Hiesook Noh and Hyun C Noh |
T.D Service Company and American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc |
5:2011cv01533 |
March 30, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Santa Clara |
Edward J. Davila |
Paul Singh Grewal |
All Other Real Property |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE re 24 Stipulation filed by Hyun C Noh. The Clerk shall close this file. Motions terminated: 14 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's' Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Rel ief Can Be Granted filed by American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc, 6 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted filed by American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/4/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2011) |
Filing 10 ORDER FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on April 21, 2011. (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2011) |
Filing 9 ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR PARTIES TO FILE EITHER A "CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE," OR ELSE A "DECLINATION TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT." Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on April 7, 2011. (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2011) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.