UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. One 2006 Cirrus SR20 Airplane
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: One 2006 Cirrus SR20 Airplane
Claimant: Visibility Unlimited LLC, Ryan Wallis and Philip Kislak
Case Number: 5:2011cv01724
Filed: April 8, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Paul Singh Grewal
Nature of Suit: Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action: 21 U.S.C. ยง 881
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL; ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 25 Proposed Order. The Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/14/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2012)
January 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER GRANTING STAY re 23 Joint Case Management Statement filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. The stay of the case is continued pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(g) until after the resolution of the related criminal prosecution or further order o f the court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file joint status updates on March 27, 2012 and every six months thereafter. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall notify the court when the criminal action is resolved and request a case management conference. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on January 18, 2012. (ejdlc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2012) Modified text on 1/18/2012 (ecg, COURT STAFF).
July 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER GRANTING 20 STIPULATION TO STAY AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/6/2011. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2011) Modified text on 7/6/2011 (ecg, COURT STAFF).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. One 2006 Cirrus SR20 Airplane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Claimant: Visibility Unlimited LLC
Represented By: Brenda Grantland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Claimant: Ryan Wallis
Represented By: Brenda Grantland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Claimant: Philip Kislak
Represented By: Brenda Grantland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: David Countryman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: One 2006 Cirrus SR20 Airplane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?