APEX Advance Holdings Limited v. Rivkin et al
Plaintiff: APEX Advance Holdings Limited
Defendant: Vladimir Rivkin, Efim Rivkin, Regina Schmidt and Igor Jonatan Schmidt
Case Number: 5:2011cv02051
Filed: April 27, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Edward J. Davila
Presiding Judge: Paul Singh Grewal
Nature of Suit: All Other Real Property
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER GRANTING 29 Voluntary Dismissal without Prejudice filed by APEX Advance Holdings Limited. The Clerk shall close this file. ***ALL Deadlines terminated. Motions terminated: 17 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Opposition to Motion to Dismiss filed by APEX Advance Holdings Limited, 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Efim Rivkin, Vladimir Rivkin, 28 Second MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Efim Rivkin, Vladimir Rivkin. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/14/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2011)
May 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 26 STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Request for Redaction of Exhibit I to Complaint re 16 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/25/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2011)
May 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR PARTIES TO FILE EITHER A "CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE," OR ELSE A "DECLINATION TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT." Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on May 3, 2011. (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2011)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: APEX Advance Holdings Limited v. Rivkin et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: APEX Advance Holdings Limited
Represented By: Steven Jude Sibley
Represented By: John DiNapoli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vladimir Rivkin
Represented By: Roger Glen Honey
Represented By: Carlos Gregory Martinez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Efim Rivkin
Represented By: Roger Glen Honey
Represented By: Carlos Gregory Martinez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Regina Schmidt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Igor Jonatan Schmidt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?