Faulk v. Sears Roebuck and Co
| Kevin Faulk |
| Sears Roebuck and Co |
| 5:2011cv02159 |
| May 3, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Paul Singh Grewal |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE re 98 Stipulation filed by Sears Roebuck and Co, Kevin Faulk, ORDER DISMISSING CASE. The1/24/2014 at 9:01am Compliance Hearing is VACATED. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 1/22/2014. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2014)
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER VACATING DATES AND SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING. Compliance Hearing is set for Friday, 1/24/2014 09:01 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 12/17/13. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2013)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 92 Motion for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2013)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 72 Motion for Class Certification (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2013)
|
|
Filing
62
STIPULATION AND AMENDED ORDER REGARDING A CHANGE IN THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR NAMED PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION re 61 Order on Stipulation. [Amended to reflect on the document that correct date for filing reply is November 26, 2012 (not 2013)]. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 9/18/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2012)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 58 Stipulation/Request to Modify Briefing Schedule on Motion for Class Certification. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2012)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER RESCHEDULING HEARING ON MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION Motion Hearing set for 12/11/2012 09:00 AM before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 4/3/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2012)
|
|
Filing
53
PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by SI on 2/14/12 (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2012)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/20/2012 02:30 PM. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2011)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2011)
|
|
Filing
26
STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on August 11, 2011. (jflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Faulk v. Sears Roebuck and Co | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kevin Faulk | |
| Represented By: | Robert Gordon Padrick |
| Represented By: | T. John Kirk |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sears Roebuck and Co | |
| Represented By: | Mark C. Dosker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
