Graifman v. Trend Micro Corporation
| Brian Graifman |
| Trend Micro Corporation |
| 5:2011cv02488 |
| May 20, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
92
ORDER Certifying Settlement Class and Granting Final Approval of Class Action Settlement. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 11/15/13. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2013)
|
|
Filing
89
STIPULATION AND ORDER 88 Continuing Final Approval Hearing to November 15, 2013. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 10/17/13. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2013)
|
|
Filing
78
Order by Hon. Ronald M. Whyte granting 76 Stipulation re Amended Settlement Agreement.(rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2013)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER by Judge Whyte granting 61 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery to November 26, 2012 (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2012).
|
|
Filing
60
STIPULATION AND ORDER 59 Extending Dates and Deadlines Re: Class Certification Phase. Motion Hearing set for 2/1/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Ronald M. Whyte. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 8/8/12. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2012)
|
|
Filing
58
STIPULATION AND ORDER 56 Extending Dates and Deadlines Re: Class Certification Phase: Motion Hearing set for 11/9/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Ronald M. Whyte. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 5/30/12. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2012)
|
|
Filing
55
STIPULATION AND ORDER 54 Extending Time to Respond to Discovery. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 3/28/12. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2012)
|
|
Filing
51
STIPULATION AND ORDER 49 Extending Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint and Discovery. Motion Hearing set for 6/1/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Ronald M. Whyte. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 1/10/12. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2012)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER re 46 Stipulation filed by Brian Graifman. Signed by Judge Whyte on 11/9/2011. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2011)
|
|
Filing
44
Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Whyte on 9/30/2011. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Graifman v. Trend Micro Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Trend Micro Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Tod Lawrence Gamlen |
| Represented By: | Irene V. Gutierrez |
| Represented By: | Matthew Thomas McCrary |
| Represented By: | Mark D. Taylor |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Brian Graifman | |
| Represented By: | Timothy J. Burke |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
