Urista v. Bank of America , N.A. et al
Olga Urista |
Edrina Pavel, CalCounties Title Nation, Janet Doran, Bank of America , N.A. and BAC Home Loans Services, LP |
5:2011cv03097 |
June 23, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Santa Clara |
Howard R. Lloyd |
Truth in Lending |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 119 ORDER GRANTING 118 Request for Substitution of Attorney. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 5/1/12. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2012) |
Filing 88 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 87 . The entry of default as to defendant Freddie Mac is hereby set aside. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 1/9/12. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2012) |
Filing 86 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS; DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO STRIKE; DENYING BANK OF AMERICA'S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE 63 64 65 67 68 69 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 1/3/2012.(hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2012) |
Filing 52 ORDER Granting 10 Motion to Dismiss; Granting 12 Motion to Dismiss; Denying Bank of America's Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's Complaint; Granting in part and Denying in part Defendant Bank of America's Request for Judicial Notice; Denying Plaintiff's Request for Judicial Notice. Signed by Magistrate Howard R. Lloyd on 10/18/11. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2011) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.