Marcos v. Equity One Lenders Group et al
| Jaime Marcos |
| E*Trade Mortgage Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Equity One Lenders Group, Jeff B Barton, Cameron W Barton, Hamilton Finance, Bee Lay Tay and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. |
| 5:2011cv04000 |
| August 15, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd granting 34 plaintiff's Motion for Remand. Dkt. Nos. 35 Motion to Dismiss and 37 Motion to Strike taken off calendar. Case remanded to Santa Clara County Superior Court. Clerk to close the file. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2011)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd granting 12 defendant E*Trade Mortgage Corporation's Motion to Dismiss; and denying as moot 17 E*Trade Mortgage Corporation's Motion to Strike. 11/1/2011 hearing is vacated. Plaintiff's amended complaint to be filed within 14 days from the date of this order. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2011)
|
|
Filing
30
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 29 Continuing Case Management Conference. Initial case management conference continued to 1/10/2012, 1:30 PM. All related deadlines adjusted accordingly. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 10/19/2011. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
