Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Panda Express, Inc.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commision |
Panda Express, Inc. |
David A. Garcia |
5:2011cv04021 |
August 17, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Santa Clara |
Howard R. Lloyd |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT. The court is informed parties have reached a settlement. The Case Management Conference set for 12/13/11 is VACATED. All parties shall appear on January 10, 2012 at 10:00 to show cause why this case should not be dismissed. If a dismissal is filed before hearing, the hearing will be vacated. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 1/10/2012 10:00 AM. Show Cause Response due by 1/3/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 12/8/11. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2011) |
Filing 14 ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, currently set for 11/1/2011, to 12/13/2011. Case Management Statement due by 12/6/2011. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/13/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom 2, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 10/25/11. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2011) |
Filing 11 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MEDIATION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 10/13/11. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2011) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.