ELPIDA Memory, Inc. v. Nanya Technology Corporation et al
ELPIDA Memory, Inc. |
Nanya Technology Corporation Delaware, Nanya Technology Corporation U.S.A. and Nanya Technology Corporation |
5:2011cv04411 |
September 6, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
San Francisco |
Lucy H. Koh |
Howard R. Lloyd |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 37 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' UNOPPOSED MOTION TO STAY PURSUANT TO 28 USC 1659 AND VACATING AND RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 35 Motion to Stay. This case is STAYED pending completion of the U.S. International Trade Commission's investigation. The Case Management Conference currently set for 2/7/2012 is VACATED and RE-SET for 8/13/2012 at 2:00pm. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2012) |
Filing 31 ORDER re 30 Stipulation to Continue Case Management Conference. Case Management Conference set for 2/8/2012 02:00 PM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 1/11/12. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2012) |
Filing 28 Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting in part and denying in part 22 Motion to Continue Case Management Conference. Case Management Conference set for 1/4/12 continued to 1/25/12.(lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2012) |
Filing 17 Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 13 Motion for Admission of Nathan W. McCutcheon Pro Hac Vice.(lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2011) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.