Ammer v. Apple, Inc. et al
| Jarret Ammer |
| Apple, Inc., Pandora Media, Inc. and Backflip Studios, Inc. |
| 5:2011cv04542 |
| September 13, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Paul Singh Grewal |
| Lucy H. Koh |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CLERKS NOTICE advising counsel of receipt of case (Jarret Ammer -v- Apple, Inc., et al, 7:11-cv-02841) from the Southern District of New York (OUR CASE NO. C11-04542) (Attachments: # 1 Order Regarding MDL Panel Conditional Transfer Order) (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2011) |
| Filing 9 Case transferred in from District of New York Southern; Case Number 7:11-cv-02841. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| Filing 8 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER OUT ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL...transferring this action from the U.S.D.C. - S.D.N.Y to the United States District Court - Northern District of California. (Signed by MDL Panel on 9/7/2011) (fk) |
| MDL TRANSFER OUT ELECTRONICALLY: to the United States District Court - Northern District of California (fk) |
Filing 7
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER STAYING CASE: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned counsel for the parties as follows:1 The above-captioned case is stayed pending its return from the United StatesJudicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation; and 2. All deadlines in this action are vacated til further order of the Court. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 8/30/2011) (fk) Modified on 9/1/2011 (fk).
|
| Filing 6 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Vincent L. Briccetti from Daniel E. Clark dated 8/25/2011 re: Defendants request that their time to answer the complaint in this matter be extended one week from August 25, 2011 to September 1, 2011. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. Apple, Inc. answer due 9/1/2011; Backflip Studios, Inc. answer due 9/1/2011; Pandora Media, Inc. answer due 9/1/2011. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 8/25/2011) (mml) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Apple, Inc. served on 8/4/2011, answer due 8/25/2011. Service was accepted by Aixa Flores, Managing Agent. Document filed by Jarret Ammer. (Rosenthal, Fred) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Pandora Media, Inc. served on 8/4/2011, answer due 8/25/2011. Service was accepted by Aixa Flores, Managing Agent. Document filed by Jarret Ammer. (Rosenthal, Fred) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Vincent L. Briccetti. Judge J. Frederick Motz is no longer assigned to the case. (laq) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER:This case has been assigned to J. Frederick Motz. Judge Motz is a District Judge in the District of Maryland, sitting by designation in the White Plains Division of the Southern District of New York, for the purpose of managing cases that would have been assigned to Judge Stephen Robinson until Judge Robinsons successor is appointed. (Signed by Judge J. Frederick Motz on 4/27/2011) (rj)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Backflip Studios, Inc., Pandora Media, Inc. (Filing Fee $ 350.00, Receipt Number 1005196)Document filed by Jarret Ammer.(rj) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Apple, Inc., Backflip Studios, Inc., Pandora Media, Inc. (rj) |
| Magistrate Judge Lisa M. Smith is so designated. (rj) |
| Case Designated ECF. (rj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
