Stockton v. Adams et al
Robert John Stockton, Jr. |
Derrel John Adams, R. Subia and D Bradbury |
5:2011cv05562 |
November 17, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Santa Clara |
PSLC CLA |
Ronald M. Whyte |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 45 ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Denying 36 , 37 , 39 , 40 Motions for Reconsideration. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2015) |
Filing 35 JUDGMENT, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 2/9/15. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2015) |
Filing 31 ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Denying 23 Motion to Dismiss; Denying 25 , 26 Motion to Consolidate or Amend; Further Briefing. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2014) |
Filing 22 ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Denying 13 Motion to Dismiss. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2013) |
Filing 19 ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Denying 15 Second Motion to Appoint Counsel. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2012) |
Filing 11 ORDER Grantig Motion for Reconsideration; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Habeas Answer due by 9/21/2012. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 7/23/12. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2012) |
Filing 10 ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Granting 7 Motion for Reconsideration; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2012) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.