Susott v. Susott

Susott v. Susott

Plaintiff:	John L Susott
Defendant:	Daniel Susott
Case Number:	5:2012cv00581
Filed:	February 6, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office:	San Jose Office
County:	Monterey
Presiding Judge:	Howard R. Lloyd
Nature of Suit:	Other Fraud
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 27, 2012	Filing 28 ORDER THAT CASES BE REASSIGNED TO A DISTRICT JUDGE. These cases were randomly assigned to a magistrate judge for all purposes including trial. On February 24, this court instructed all parties to file either a consent or a declination by March 26, 20 12. Since not all parties have done so, this court is unable to provide the dispositive relief sought. The Clerk of Court is ORDERED to reassign this case to a district court judge. All current dates and deadlines are vacated. ***Deadlines terminated. (10 in 5:12-cv-00597-HRL). Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 3/27/12. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2012)
February 24, 2012	Filing 11 ORDER RE DEADLINE FOR CONSENT OR DECLINATION TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. All parties who have not done so shall, no later than March 26, 2012, file either a consent or declination to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Forms are available in the Clerk's Office and may also be obtained from the court's website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 2/23/12. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2012)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 27, 2012

Filing 28 ORDER THAT CASES BE REASSIGNED TO A DISTRICT JUDGE. These cases were randomly assigned to a magistrate judge for all purposes including trial. On February 24, this court instructed all parties to file either a consent or a declination by March 26, 20 12. Since not all parties have done so, this court is unable to provide the dispositive relief sought. The Clerk of Court is ORDERED to reassign this case to a district court judge. All current dates and deadlines are vacated. ***Deadlines terminated. (10 in 5:12-cv-00597-HRL). Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 3/27/12. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2012)

February 24, 2012

Filing 11 ORDER RE DEADLINE FOR CONSENT OR DECLINATION TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. All parties who have not done so shall, no later than March 26, 2012, file either a consent or declination to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Forms are available in the Clerk's Office and may also be obtained from the court's website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 2/23/12. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2012)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Susott v. Susott
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: John L Susott
Represented By:	Thomas Anthony Vogele
Represented By:	Timothy M Kowal
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Susott
Represented By:	John Samuel Preston
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?