Advanced Engineering Solution, Inc v. Paccar, Inc. et al
| Advanced Engineering Solution, Inc |
| Jordan Reynolds, Paccar, Inc., Kenworth Truck Company, Kalypso, Inc, Parametric Technology Corporation and Andrew Timm |
| 5:2012cv00986 |
| February 27, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on October 15, 2012. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2012)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER Dismissing Defendants Kenworth Truck Co., Kalypso Inc., Parametric Technology Corp., Andrew Timm, and Jordan Reynolds; Order Setting Case Management Conference for Remaining Parties. Case Management Conference set for 10/24/2012 02:00 PM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 9/12/12. (lhklc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2012)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER SETTING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO OSC. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on August 20, 2012. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2012)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER to Show Cause Why Case Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 7/23/2012. (lhklc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2012)
|
|
Filing
25
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 23 Stipulation.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
