GPNE Corp. v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
| GPNE Corp. |
| Amazon.com Inc |
| 5:2012cv03055 |
| June 14, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Phyllis J. Hamilton |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
370
ORDER CLARIFYING THAT MAY 31, 2013 ORDER DENIED THE PARTIES REQUEST TO STAY THE CASE. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on June 5, 2013. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2013)
|
|
Filing
368
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 367 Stipulation.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2013)
|
|
Filing
361
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 360 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2013)
|
|
Filing
335
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 334 Motion for Leave to File.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2012)
|
|
Filing
333
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 330 Motion to Amend/Correct ; GPNE Corp. is required to E-FILE the amended document.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2012)
|
|
Filing
324
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 319 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2012)
|
|
Filing
305
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Joint Case Management Statement due by 8/2/2012. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/9/2012 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 7/6/12. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
