GPNE Corp. v. Nokia Corporation et al
| GPNE Corp. |
| Nokia Inc and Nokia Corporation |
| 3:2012cv03056 |
| June 15, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Phyllis J. Hamilton |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE AND REPLY REGARDING GPNE CORP.'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND/SUPPLEMENT ITS INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS POST-MARKMAN Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on October 10, 2013. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2013)
|
|
Filing
56
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 55 Motion to Continue.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2012)
|
|
Filing
48
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 43 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2012)
|
|
Filing
40
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 35 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2012)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Joint Case Management Statement due by 9/13/2012. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/20/2012 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 7/25/12. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2012)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 7/11/12. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
