Liberty City Church of Christ Inc., et al v. Taylor et al
| Liberty City Church of Christ Inc.,, Mary Dinish, Kauisha Smith, Larry Rucks and Robert Burke |
| Ephren Taylor, Meshelle Taylor, City of Capital Corporation, Erx Energy LLC., Equity Trust Company, Robert Batt, Alan Lipinski and Donald M. Macintyre |
| 5:2012cv04392 |
| August 21, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Edward J. Davila |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO CLOSE FILE. Defendants Motion to Dismiss on the basis of improper venue having been granted and no further activity having occurred in this case, the court orders that the clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/19/2013. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2013)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER granting 28 Motion to Dismiss; granting 18 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/15/2013. (ejdlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/15/2013)
|
|
Filing
31
Order Granting 29 Motion to Appear by Telephone. Counsel for Equity Trust is required to arrange the telephonic appearance with Court Call in advance of the conference. Signed by Hon. Edward J. Davila on 11/21/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
