Agnir v. The Gryphon Solutions, LLC et al
| Elizabeth Palisoc Agnir |
| Jay Michael Tenenbaum, Ian Nathan Willens, the Gryphon Solutions, LLC and Michael Charles Brkich |
| 5:2012cv04470 |
| August 24, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Lucy H. Koh |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
ORDER TO WITHDRAW MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 3/24/2014. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2014)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER dismissing with prejudice. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 11/15/2013. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2013)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 43 Motion to Dismiss; granting 44 Motion to Strike 55 Opposition/Response to Motion, (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2013)
|
|
Filing
47
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 46 Stipulation to Amend Briefing Schedule.(lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2013)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 41 Stipulation (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2013)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh finding as moot 36 Stipulation; granting 37 Stipulation; terminating 20 Motion to Strike ; terminating 21 Motion to Dismiss (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2013)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 24 Stipulation (lhklc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
