Lopez v. National Credit Reporting ,Inc
Plaintiff: Susana Lopez
Defendant: National Credit Reporting ,Inc
Case Number: 5:2012cv05166
Filed: October 4, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
County: Kern
Presiding Judge: Howard R. Lloyd
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER denying 43 plaintiff's request for telephonic appearance. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 4/7/2014. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2014)
April 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER denying 41 defendant's request for third continuance of show cause hearing re settlement. Counsel of record shall appear in person for the 4/8/2014 show cause hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 4/4/2014. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2014)
March 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER Granting 38 , 39 Parties' Second Request to Continue Show Cause Hearing. Stipulated dismissal due by 3/25/2014. If dismissal not filed by that date, then Show Cause Response due by 4/1/2014 and Show Cause Hearing set for 4/8/2014 10:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 3/5/2014. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2014)
February 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER granting 36 parties' request to continue show cause hearing. Stipulated dismissal due by 2/28/2014. If dismissal not filed by that date, then Show Cause Response due by 3/4/2014 and Show Cause Hearing set for 3/11/2014 10:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 2/10/2014. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2014)
December 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re Settlement. Dismissal due by 1/31/2014. If dismissal not filed by that date, then Show Cause Response due by 2/4/2014 and Show Cause Hearing set for 2/11/2014 10:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 12/6/2013. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2013)
November 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER Re-Setting ADR Deadline. Mediation to be completed by 1/15/2014. Parties are admonished to cooperate with the mediator in scheduling the mediation session. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 11/6/2013. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2013)
May 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd denying 21 defendant's Motion to Dismiss and re-setting initial case management conference. Initial case management conference set for 6/11/2013, 1:30 PM. Related deadlines adjusted accordingly. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2013)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lopez v. National Credit Reporting ,Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Susana Lopez
Represented By: William John Wall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National Credit Reporting ,Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?