Rivera v. Fremont Union High School District et al
| Carlos Rivera |
| Fremont Union High School District, California Department of Education and The State of California, Office of Administration Hearings |
| 5:2012cv05714 |
| November 7, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Alameda |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on August 30, 2013. (ejdlc4S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2013)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on June 26, 2013. (ejdlc4S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2013)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER GRANTING 41 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Carlos Rivera, The State of California. Office of Administration Hearings terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 6/12/2013. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2013)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER GRANTING 38 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Carlos Rivera. Fremont Union High School District terminated. Motions terminated: 35 MOTION to Dismiss Notice of Motion and Motion of Defendant Fremont Union High School District to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof filed by Fremont Union High School District. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/7/2013. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
