The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, an Ohio Corporation v. BCI Builders, Inc et al
| The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, an Ohio Corporation |
| Dene Bustichi, Melodie M Bustichi and BCI Builders, Inc |
| 5:2012cv06443 |
| December 19, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
STIPULATION AND ORDER 33 for Dismissal Without Prejudice of Entire Case, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 3/20/14. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2014)
|
|
Filing
26
STIPULATION AND ORDER 25 Continuing Case Management Conference: Case Management Conference set for 9/13/2013 10:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 7/10/13. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2013)
|
|
Filing
22
STIPULATION AND ORDER 21 Rescheduling Case Management Conference: Case Management Conference set for 5/17/2013 10:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 5/8/13. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2013)
|
|
Filing
13
STIPULATION AND ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MEDIATION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on March 14, 2013. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
