Garcia v. City Of Gilroy et al
Nelson Garcia |
City Of Gilroy, City of Gilroy Police Department (CGPD), Eustaquio Rodriquez and Denise J Turner |
5:2013cv00431 |
January 30, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Santa Clara |
Howard R. Lloyd |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. This action is DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/17/2015. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2015) |
Filing 16 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. If Plaintiff does not, by 2/13/2015, file a return to this order to show cause which provides the information previously requested or otherwise demonstrate good cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed, the court will dismiss the action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). No hearing will be held on the order to show cause unless otherwise ordered by the court. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/6/2015. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2015) |
Filing 15 ORDER re: Status of Criminal Proceedings. Plaintiff shall file a notice providing the status of Plaintiffs related state criminal proceedings on or before 1/9/2015. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 12/29/2014. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2014) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.