Hoang et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
| Susan B Hoang and Daniel X Hoang |
| California Reconveyance Company, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Dreamsky Investments, LLC and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company |
| 5:2013cv00582 |
| February 11, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Edward J. Davila |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Foreclosure |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER granting 9 Motion to Dismiss. The hearing and Case Management Conference scheduled for 4/12/2013 are VACATED. The Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 4/9/2013. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2013)
|
|
Filing
18
STIPULATION AND ORDER AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT Shortening Time and Advancing Hearing on Motions to Dismiss and Expunge. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION Dismissal and Expunge Lis Pendens : Opposition due by 3/25/2013. Reply due by 4/1/2013. Motion Hearing set for 4/12/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Edward J. Davila. Motions terminated: 14 Ex Parte Application for Order Shortening Time and Advancing Hearing Date on Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens 9 filed by Dreamsky Investments, LLC. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/21/2013. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
