Doe v. Washington Township Healthcare District et al
| Jane Doe |
| Jon Quianzon, Washington Township Healthcare District and Washington Hospital |
| 3:2013cv00745 |
| February 20, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Laurel Beeler |
| P.I.: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 41 Dismissal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 3/21/2014. The clerk shall close the file. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2014)
|
|
Filing
40
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 39 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Discovery (Second Request) filed by Jane Doe. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 12/20/2013. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2013)
|
|
Filing
38
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 37 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Discovery (First Request) filed by Jane Doe. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 10/28/2013. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2013)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER, Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd. Hon. Jeffrey S. White no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 6/24/13. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2013)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER GRANTING 22 STIPULATION Selecting Private ADR. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 6/10/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
