Patel et al v. U.S. Bank, N.A. et al
| Asvini Patel and Pravina Patel |
| U.S. Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Homeward Residential, Inc., Power Default Services, Inc. and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. |
| 5:2013cv00748 |
| February 20, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Monterey |
| Paul Singh Grewal |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim on 7/27/2016. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2016)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER ON REMAND. Supplemental Brief due by 6/29/2016. Response due by 7/13/2016. Motion Hearing set for 7/27/2016 09:30 AM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim on 6/15/2016. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2016)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Paul S. Grewal granting 35 Motion for Summary Judgment (psglc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2014)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO EXPUNGE by Judge Paul S. Grewal granting 8 Motion to Dismiss; granting 11 Motion to Expunge (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
